« Is This Rachel Maddow? | Main | Obama Names New Ninja Czar »
Friday
Jul092010

Message Control By The Obama Administration

This is an excellent article from the Columbia Journalism Review about the amount of control the Obama Administration has tried to exert on the press. Needless to say, it's extensive.

On March 4, President Obama sat behind his stout oak desk, flanked by beaming lawmakers, and, wielding a pen for the cameras, signed the Travel Promotion Act into law. Just a routine White House moment, right?

Maybe not. The images from which I—and others in the press—recreated that scene were captured by government employees. The White House released a photo to the world and produced a slick video that would have looked right at home on the evening news. No journalist was present for the bill signing because none were invited.

The bill, which passed Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support, had the anodyne goal of luring foreign tourist dollars to these shores. Not so controversial. But the ceremony was just one recent example of an unsettling trend of limiting press access to major events at the White House, from the Dalai Lama’s visit to the odd do-over of Obama’s flubbed attempt to take the oath of office.

Despite the administration’s trumpeting of its record on transparency—not to mention its use of the issue as a campaign cudgel—on the whole reporters have found this White House to be no different than the Bush administration (or any other recent administration) when it comes to providing information or being accessible to the press. “By and large, they’re just like all of their predecessors,” says CBS Radio correspondent Mark Knoller, who has covered every president since Gerald Ford. “They give us information that serves their interests more than our interests.”

Message control is central to every administration, and it would have been naïve to expect much else. But the Obama White House has actually regressed in some troubling ways. For instance, Obama has been far less available for questioning by journalists than even President Bush, who was openly contemptuous of the press. And accommodations on off-the-record background briefings and White House photo releases—both forged in the wake of significant press failures in the run-up to the Iraq war—have eroded since Obama took office.

Photo releases, where shots taken by the official White House photographer are offered to news outlets, are nothing new. But photojournalists have long been irked when such photos are the only images of an event that could have easily been made public. In 2005, after an increase in presidential events from which they were excluded, the White House News Photographers Association allied with other press organizations and successfully pressed the Bush White House to routinely allow photographers back in. “We won the access under the Bush administration, and it has been taken away under the Obama administration,” says Ron Sachs, who chairs the association’s advocacy committee. He pointed to a series of recent incidents, including the decision to bar photographers from Obama’s February 18 meeting with the Dalai Lama in favor of releasing a single, no-smiles still taken by Pete Souza, the official White House photographer.

It wouldn’t take much to let the photographic pool into the room for half a minute, thereby producing dozens of shots for editors to choose from. Instead, the only record of official White House business is often a single frame, curated by the president’s staff in accordance with the administration’s message of the day.

Rest HERE

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

I'd like to remind that chode-in-chief that he works for me and you. That is not a private business. He is in there by lying, cheating, and being black, but he was still elected by and for (ignorant) people which makes it a PUBLIC office. Unless it's a threat to national security, he damn well better smile for the camera. That's something he should have learned in Haaaaavaaaard.

July 9, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSideburns

Obama is bad by any measure

July 9, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterHerb Tarlek

If i had to make a comparison to President Ear Leader, it would be like going to Paris,
find the best restaurant and order the best filet mignon of the house and the waiter
bringing you two month old Sardines thats been out in the sun...

Ear Leader's wheel is still spinning, but his hamster has been dead for a long time...

July 9, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterGeorgiaDawg

This is one thing for which I don't blame the oba mao administration. If you could completely and totally control the message, why wouldn't you? Blame the compliant slobbering democrat media. They don't protest, so this will only happen more and more.
You might ask: Why don't the media protest? Two reasons. First, of course, seems to be that the whole of media is inundated with leftist lieberals that want to actively promote the king of leftist lieberals. But the second is that the editors see this as a way to save money. Wow - this whole episode is shot, packaged and produced for them, and they didn't have to pay a dime for a reporter, a film crew, and a production editor - it's all taxpayer paid. What a deal!

July 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJR

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>