Eric Holder Is An Idiot (with video proof)
Friday, May 14, 2010 at 10:47AM Eric Holder, our socialist Attorney General, has been making the rounds on television lately suggesting he may bring a lawsuit against the state of Arizona to overturn the immigration law they recently passed. In order for him to make such a bold proclamation you would naturally assume that he had studied the Arizona bill carefully to determine its legitimacy. Well, you would assume wrong - the idiot admitted yesterday in a Congressional hearing that he had never read the bill that he was threatening to sue over.
Let's go to the tape.
I would normally suggest that such an affront should be grounds for firing, but there is no chance that will happen under the Obama administration. They need a socialist hump like Holder to look the other way while they plunder our wealth, freedom and international standing.

Reader Comments (5)
What a monumental dumb bastard he is. This administration is jam packed w/ IDIOTS!
Well said TLW! This guy is a freaking assclown, on display for all to see. Embarrassing.
Here is the translation from libspeak.
"I am calling all my buddies and asking their thoughts, since we are now heading down the course of Socialism. O'wereismybrain, Tingles, and Bull Dike at MSNBC told me that all of those Tea Baggers in Arizona don't have a clue and this is a bad law! Brother Bill from HBO said the people of Arizona are too stupid. All of my BOF's on the east and west coast think we should sit around the campfire and sing Kumbaya. And the "High Prince of O" said that it must be unconstitutional, because he uses it to wipe his feet with."
So, no I have not made up my mind yet.
Well said Quake. How these clowns get away with this stuff is just amazing. If we had a fair press, it wouldn't happen. They simply don't show Democrats making fools of themselves.
Questions that should have been asked: "Don't you think that it is grossly irresponsible for the U. S. Attorney General to rely on media reports to base your opinion, rather than reading a 10 page law? Why didn't your associates within the Justice Department see fit to read the law and advise you on its content, rather than allowing you to be hung out to dry in this congressional hearing?"