NY Times: Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nukes
Monday, April 5, 2010 at 9:01PM Just saw this on Drudge and haven't read anything with regard to expert opinion on this move, but I have to believe this is one of the stupidest things a stupid administration has done to date. What's next, are we going to give the Chinese our launch codes to show how magnanimous we are? The insanity continues:
President Obama said Monday that he was revamping American nuclear strategy to substantially narrow the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons, even in self defense.
But the president said in an interview that he was carving out an exception for “outliers like Iran and North Korea” that have violated or renounced the main treaty to halt nuclear proliferation.
Discussing his approach to nuclear security the day before formally releasing his new strategy, Mr. Obama described his policy as part of a broader effort to edge the world toward making nuclear weapons obsolete, and to create incentives for countries to give up any nuclear ambitions. To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.
Mr. Obama’s strategy is a sharp shift from those adopted by his predecessors and seeks to revamp the nation’s nuclear posture for a new age in which rogue states and terrorist organizations are greater threats than traditional powers like Russia and China.
It eliminates much of the ambiguity that has deliberately existed in American nuclear policy since the opening days of the Cold War. For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons, or launched a crippling cyberattack.
Those threats, he argued, could be deterred with “a series of graded options” -- a combination of old and newly designed conventional weapons.
“I’m going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the American people are safe and secure,” Mr. Obama said during the interview in the Oval Office.
White House officials said that the new strategy will leave open the option of reconsidering the use of nuclear retaliation against a biological attack, if the development of such weapons reaches a level that makes United States vulnerable to a devastating strike.
Mr. Obama’s new strategy is bound to be controversial, both among conservatives who have warned against diluting America’s most potent deterrent, and among liberals who were hoping for a blanket statement that America would never be the first to use nuclear weapons.
Mr. Obama argued for a slower course, saying, “We are going to want to make sure that we can continue to move towards less emphasis on nuclear weapons,” and, he added, to “make sure that our conventional weapons capability is an effective deterrent in all but the most extreme circumstances.”
The release of the new strategy, known as the “Nuclear Posture Review,” opens an intensive nine days of nuclear diplomacy geared toward reducing weapons. Mr. Obama’s plans to fly to Prague to sign a new arms control agreement with Russia on Thursday and then next week will host 47 world leaders in Washington for a summit on nuclear security.
The most immediate test of the new strategy is likely to be in dealing with Iran, which has defied the international community by developing a nuclear program that it insists is peaceful but that the United States and its allies say is a precursor to weapons. Asked about the escalating confrontation with Iran, Mr. Obama said he was now convinced that “the current course they’re are on would provide them with nuclear weapons capabilities,” though he gave no timeline.
He dodged when asked whether he shared Israel’s view that a “nuclear capable” Iran was as dangerous as one that actually possessed weapons.
“I’m not going to parse that right now,” he said, sitting in his office as children played on the South Lawn of the White House during a day-long Easter Egg roll. However, he cited the example of North Korea, whose nuclear capabilities were unclear until it conducted a test in 2006, which it followed with a second shortly after Mr. Obama took office.
“I think it’s safe to say that there was a time when North Korea was said to be simply a nuclear-capable state until it kicked out the IAEA and become a self-professed nuclear state,” he said. “And so rather than splitting hairs on this, I think that the international community has a strong sense of what it means to pursue civilian nuclear energy for peaceful purposes versus a weaponizing capability.”
Reader Comments (6)
This really pisses me off. What is this idiot thinking? How does this help our country strategically? He is screwing us to make himself look good to the international community. This moron should be impeached. He is dangerous.
Next thing you know, he'll be announcing to the world that the United States will be eliminating all of our nuclear weapons. Seriously. What purpose does it serve to tell our enemies how we will torture them or under what conditions we will use nukes? As AJ said, HOW DOES THAT HELP US?
Without some sort of maintenance/upgrade plan, our existing arsenal will rapidly become inoperable. Then what?
I wouldn't be surprised if some of the launch control systems still had vacuum tubes.
I agree Bruce. He's said we will not upgrade our systems. Once again, how does that benefit this country? This guy is absolutely not fit to lead. Seven more years of this and we'll be a third world country speaking chinese.
OK, let me get this straight. You're the rich kid in high school. In order to have diversity, you must walk through a really bad neighborhood to reach your school. Your brother, who is the biggest, most feared guy in town, walks you to school everyday. Once, some guys got together and tried to beat you up but your brother just annihilated them till they cried "uncle". Word of this quickly got around the neighborhood and they left you alone except for the occasional idiot who would come after you.
Now this morning you get up thinking maybe these tough guys would like you if you just tried to be friends with them, so you sneak out of the house without your brother. When you reach the middle of the neighborhood, you shout as loud as you can, I LOVE YOU GUYS AND I'M NOT GOING TO BRING MY BIG BROTHER WITH ME EVER AGAIN!
(Memorials may be sent to the religion of one's choice, which will be Muslim)
Well stated HB. I think that pretty much nails it. As Krauthammer said on Fox, it defies all logic.