I'm too young to remember the Global Cooling, but it's fascinating how they went back to the same playbook, changing cooling to warming. I guess you can sell anything to the American public with the help of the press.
I can hardly wait to see what Obamachev has to say at Copenhagen. I'm sure he will be praising the virtues of the recent EPA actions to regulate CO2. And all this without passing Cap and Tax! The MSM (finally) reports butcontinues to discount the East Anglia e-mails ( http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2009/12/07/bozell-nets-cover-climategate-load-story-bias ) and insists that the science is still valid. How on earth can the science be valid if the data fed to their climate models had been significantly altered? This is insane! Can you imagine what we'd be up against if it weren't for the internet and widespread communication of alternative views instead of having to rely on only the MSM?
Bruce, very well put. We'd be up the creek if it weren't for the Internet and talk radio, but we all know they are making inroads to eliminate those media options. These guys are clearly playing hardball here and have put all their eggs in the 2009 basket. No much question about what liberals really stand for anymore, huh?
Monday, December 7, 2009 at 8:20PM
Reader Comments (6)
That puts in perspective. Love the cartoon that accompanies the story.
These guys have no shame. What will it be next? Global Moderating? Anything to take power.
I'm too young to remember the Global Cooling, but it's fascinating how they went back to the same playbook, changing cooling to warming. I guess you can sell anything to the American public with the help of the press.
Karen, very well said. That is exactly how they have been able to pull this farce off - the help of a traitorous press.
I can hardly wait to see what Obamachev has to say at Copenhagen. I'm sure he will be praising the virtues of the recent EPA actions to regulate CO2. And all this without passing Cap and Tax!
The MSM (finally) reports butcontinues to discount the East Anglia e-mails ( http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2009/12/07/bozell-nets-cover-climategate-load-story-bias ) and insists that the science is still valid. How on earth can the science be valid if the data fed to their climate models had been significantly altered? This is insane!
Can you imagine what we'd be up against if it weren't for the internet and widespread communication of alternative views instead of having to rely on only the MSM?
Bruce, very well put. We'd be up the creek if it weren't for the Internet and talk radio, but we all know they are making inroads to eliminate those media options. These guys are clearly playing hardball here and have put all their eggs in the 2009 basket. No much question about what liberals really stand for anymore, huh?